حجية الدليل الرقمي في الاثبات الجنائي

General References:

I. Al-Ardi, R. K. J. (2019). Electronic evidence and its impact on the theory of criminal evidence: A comparative study. Beirut: Zain Legal and Literary Publications.

II. Al-Bishri, M. A. (2004). Investigation of emerging crimes (1st ed.). Riyadh: Naif Arab University for Security Sciences.

III. Al-Bishri, M. A. (2004). Investigation of emerging crimes. Riyadh: Naif Arab University for Security Sciences.

IV. Al-Khan, T. (2011). Cybercrime. Damascus: Syrian Virtual University Publications.

V. Al-Marri, B. (2021). Criminal evidence and the impact of scientific and electronic evidence on the judge's conviction. Cairo: Dar al-Ahram for Legal Publications.

VI. Al-Saghir, J. A. B. (2012). Criminal evidence and modern technology (radar devices, computers, and DNA fingerprinting): A comparative study. Cairo: Dar al-Nahda al-Arabiya.

VII. Al-Talaba, A. H. (2009). The legitimacy of electronic evidence derived from criminal investigation. Bahrain: Security Media Center.

VIII. Hosni, M. N. (1989). Explanation of the penal code: General section (3rd ed.). Cairo: Dar al-Nahda al-Arabiya.

IX. Ibrahim, K. M. (2015). Cybercrimes. Alexandria: Dar al-Fikr al-Jamiʿi.

X. Iraqi, K. A. (2022). The law on combating cybercrimes and rumors. Sharjah: United Publishing and Distribution.

XI. Mukhlif, H. R. M. (2011). Rules of weighing conflicting evidence in civil lawsuits: A comparative study (Vol. 1). Beirut: Zain Legal Publications.

XII. Musa, H. (2018). Crimes committed through social media: A comparative study. Cairo: Dar al-Nahda al-Arabiya.

XIII. Shahin, M. K. (2018). Procedural aspects of cybercrime in the preliminary investigation stage: A comparative study. Alexandria: Dar al-Jamiah al-Jadida.

XIV. Younis, O. M. A. B. (2004). Crimes arising from the use of the Internet. Cairo: Dar al-Nahda al-Arabiya.

XV. Younis, O. M. (2007). Digital evidence (1st ed.). Cairo: Dar al-Nahda al-Arabiya.

Theses and Dissertations

I. 1-Al-Hadhiri, A. T. A. (2016). Criminal evidence using modern scientific methods: A comparative study between Libyan criminal law and contemporary jurisprudence (Master’s thesis). Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University of Malang.

II. 2-Al-Mansouri, S. M. (2018). Application of the principle of judicial conviction to electronic evidence (Master’s thesis). United Arab Emirates University.

III. 3-Ghanem, N., & Maʿmash, Z. (2013). Criminal evidence in cybercrimes (Master’s thesis). University of Abderrahmane Mira, Bejaia.

IV. 4-Madrabel, K. (2019). Evidence using digital evidence in criminal matters (Master’s dissertation). University of Akli Mohand Oulhadj, Bouira.

V. 5-Taheri, A. (2015). Criminal evidence using digital evidence (Master’s dissertation). University of M’Sila.

VI. Conferences and Symposia

VII. 6-Al-Jamali, T. (2009). Digital evidence in the field of criminal evidence. Paper presented at the First Maghreb Conference on Informatics and Law, Academy of Graduate Studies, Tripoli, October 28–29.

VIII. 7-Farghali, A. N. M., & Al-Masmari, M. U. S. (2006). Criminal evidence using digital evidence: Legal and technical perspectives. Paper presented at the First Arab Conference on Forensic Sciences and Forensic Medicine, Naif Arab University for Security Sciences, Riyadh, November 2–4.

IX. 8-Zaghloul, T. A. M. (2016). Explanation of the Omani criminal procedure code: Part two, trial and appeal methods (1st ed.). Sharjah: Dar al-Kitab al-Jamiʿi.

Journals and Periodicals

I. 1-Al-Hamdani, M., & Al-Hamdani, M. K. H. (2016). The legitimacy of electronic evidence in criminal evidence. Journal of the College of Law, University of Al-Nahrain.

II. 2-Kharbit, J. K. (2013). Investigation in cybercrimes. Arabian Gulf Journal, 41(3).

III. 3-Kharbit, J. K. (2016). Difficulties of criminal evidence in cybercrimes. Journal of Law for Legal Studies and Research, University of Dhi Qar.

IV. Laws

V. 1-State of Palestine. (2018). Cybercrime law (Law No. 10). Ramallah: Palestinian Authority.

VI. 2-Syrian Arab Republic. (2012). Law regulating communication on the Internet and combating cybercrime (Law No. 17). Damascus: Syrian Government.

VII. 3-United Arab Emirates. (1992). Law of evidence in civil and commercial transactions (Federal Law No. 10). Abu Dhabi: UAE Government.

VIII. 4-United Arab Emirates. (2021). Federal law on combating rumors and cybercrimes (Federal Law No. 34). Abu Dhabi: UAE Government.

IX. 5-United Kingdom. (2002). Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) (Amended October 14). London: UK Government.

X. United Nations. (2018). UNCITRAL model law on electronic commerce. New York: United Nations.

Judicial Decisions

I. 1-Court of Cassation (UAE). (1989). Criminal appeal No. 101/10, Session of January 4, 1989.

II. 2-Court of Cassation (UAE). (1992). Criminal appeal No. 179/13, Session of April 22, 1992.

III. 3-Federal Supreme Court (UAE). (2017). Criminal appeal No. 102, Session of April 4, 2017.

Foreign References

I. Casey, E. (2004). Digital evidence and computer crime (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier. ISBN 0-12-163104.

Websites

I. Kamel, M. (n.d.). Criminal investigation of cybercrimes. Retrieved from https://amday5